Four things you will be able to do by the end — and you will do all four on this screen.
Which three ways did you see? Watch once, then tap the ways you caught.
In telemedicine, is there still a doctor?
The topic is telemedicine. Which aspects of “telemedicine vs. an in-person visit” might the video mention? We seeded one — commuting.
Your turn: add one or two aspects of your own (up to four if you want a challenge).
Go back to ③. For each aspect, mark it: the video mentioned it · it did not · ? you are not sure.
Read each sentence, choose T or F, then check and read the evidence.
After one viewing: what is the first half of the video mainly about?
Lin has a headache. She searches online and finds two different explanations. Then she asks an AI chatbot — and gets a third one.
All three sound confident. Before trusting any of them, what could she check?
Is medical information on websites generally reliable?
P1 (comparison). By the end, which will the speaker trust more — what you find online, or a qualified doctor? Predict, and say the reason you expect.
P2 (the point). What will his conclusion be — and why does he believe it?
You wrote a prediction in ⑤. Now that you've watched: what does the speaker conclude, and what reason did you hear? Write it yourself first — then check the reference.
These are not the same kind of thing. Tap a card, then tap the column it belongs to.
For each source, write one benefit (good point) and one limitation (bad point). Then label each idea: “in the video” or “my inference” (my own reasonable guess).
Everyone speaks: 30 seconds to prepare alone → A speaks 45 seconds, B notes the evidence → swap roles → both revise → two students share with the class.
Use the evidence frames. You may say “I think … because the video says …” — the reason is the point.
Which resource first, which next, and when to move on? Any order is fine — if you can give a reason. (Going straight to a doctor is also allowed.)
Score yourself or your partner on each line — 1 (just starting) to 4 (secure).
Each row is one complete sentence you can use in your answer today. Tap the word blocks in order. A wrong block goes back — try again. One student, one row — then pass the mouse to the next person.
Someone is ill and does not know where to go. Act the three steps with the screen — book it · describe it · decide where. Every line you tap is a line you can really say.
Four groups. Each group sends one student at a time to finish one task on this board. Tap the task when it is done — the bar at the top shows how many of 12 are finished.
One sentence, English: how will you combine these resources to stay reliable without wasting effort?
Imagine Lin's cousin (fictional): a headache for two days, and two different explanations online. Make him a small information-check card with four lines:
整份课件是「一次一环节」的翻页形态:底部分页器点圆点直达、左右箭头翻页;键盘 ← → 与 PageUp / PageDown(翻页笔默认发这四个键)翻页,Home / End 直达首末环节。翻到哪一页,刷新后仍停在那页;地址栏 ?p=4 就是第④环节,可直接发给学生。离页即停:翻走时该页正在播的视频会自动暂停。封面页保留大标题,其余页收起头图把版面让给内容;教师折叠条只在第⑧页出现。
| 分钟 | 环节 | 谁在动手 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3:00 | 听写①(滚动:上单元核心词句) | 全班 |
| 3:00–7:00 | ① 医院场景(3′ 收束) | 4 名学生上台各走一站 |
| 7:00–10:00 | ② 介绍片 38″ + 三方式核对 + 1 道概念判定 | 2 人点选 |
| 10:00–12:00 | ③ 预测(写 1–2 个 aspect) | 2–3 人上台写 |
| 12:00–18:00 | ④ 前半段 + 预测核对 + T/F①② + 主旨 | 3 人上台作答 |
| 18:00–22:00 | ⑤ 虚构情境 + 投票 + 两条预测 | 4–5 人投票 |
| 22:00–27:00 | ⑥ 后半段 + T/F③④ + 结论先写后揭 | 3 人上台写 |
| 27:00–33:00 | ⑦ 三列分拣 + 四格汇总 + 讨论动线 | 小组 + 4 人上台各放一格 |
| 33:00–35:00 | ⑧ 上台拼句(三句支架) | 3 人各拼一句 |
| 35:00–37:30 | ⑨ 会诊角色扮演(预约→描述→决定) | 2 组 × 4 角色轮流 |
| 37:30–39:00 | ⑩ 四组接力(12 格) | 4 组每组 3 人接力 |
| 39:00–40:00 | ⑪ 退出条 + 信息核查卡作业 | 全班 |
Tasks x/8 口径:①场景问答卡 ≥2 ②自拟 aspect ≥1 ③T/F①② ④四格笔记 ≥1 ⑤投过票 ⑥⑧拼句完成 ≥1 ⑦路线任一框 ⑧退出条。一节课上台人数:①4 ②2 ③2–3 ④3 ⑤4–5 ⑥3 ⑦4 ⑧3 ⑨8 ⑩12 ≈ 45 人次(19 人班,人均 2 次以上)。
投票 +1 只做大屏共享时的班级计数;学生端只显示自己那票。沙特研究与条件概率本轮已按教学目标删除,此处不再计。
| 题 | 答案 | 证据(原片旁白) |
|---|---|---|
| T/F 1 | T | “no longer required to visit a surgery … advice over the phone or online” |
| T/F 2 | F | “Online consultations take place in the comfort of your home or workplace.” |
| T/F 3 | F | “only 65% of them actually believed online health information to be reliable.”(第 2 半段) |
| T/F 4 | T | “The term 'cyberchondriac' describes someone who compulsively searches the internet for medical information.”(第 2 半段) |
| (已删)Saudi 数据 | — | 本轮按教学目标删去沙特数字填空与条件概率:它们服务的是「听数字 / 条件概率」,不在四条目标内。若要用,可当延伸材料单独发。 |
| Speaker 结论 | “best medical advice … from a qualified medical professional” | 理由:misdiagnosis / dismiss / cyberchondria 焦虑 |
右下角 🟠 支架抽屉三杠杆:Frame(句型开头)/Word bank(4 术语+释义)/Example(示范另一题)。界面不出现层级标签。递减建议:环节④⑤三枚全开 → 环节⑥仅词汇 → 环节⑦全撤。逐姓名建议只在此处,学生侧不可见。左下角「📤 My case file」= 导出学生档案,两种格式:Copy text(复制文本)与 Download JSON(下载结构化 JSON,含量表/四格笔记/退出条全量)。
| 原则 | 本课证据 | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| LP1 Learning Purposes | 真实议题 + 核心问 + AI 使用边界(虚构情境卡) | 1.1 / 1.2 / 1.4 |
| LP3 Evidence of Learning | 预测→验证;拼句与角色扮演的口语产出;rubric 自评 | 3.1 / 3.3 / 3.4 |
| LP4 Learning Perspectives | 预测被推翻/不确定时诚实修正(4.1 从错误得洞见);随视频新信息调整四格笔记与判断(4.2) | 4.1 / 4.2 |
| LP5 Engagement & Autonomy | 自选 aspects;自建 route;支架自取 | 5.1 / 5.3 |
| LP7 Inclusion, Equity, Belonging | 同题三档入口;每环人人有最低产出 | 7.1 / 7.6 |
| LP2 Dimensions(辅) | 画面+旁白→判断→整合路线的推理链 | 2.1 |
| LP9 Space & Time(辅) | 可反复回看片段、自定笔记节奏(9.2 时间自主) | 9.2 |
| 不承担 LP6 / LP8 / LP10 | 社区研发、治理、长期福祉——单课不可取证 | — |
seg1(0–0:59)/ seg2(0:59–2:29,实测 90.5″,片尾无静音)由 3.mp4 切分、720p 重压;whisper 时间戳逐字稿为唯一内容源,四术语(consultation / misdiagnosis / dismiss / cyberchondriac)均已核对。T/F 四句已按 3E 学生书 p60 Ex 3 原句替换。