Listening & Speaking · Watch & Listen

Telemedicine & AIUnlock 4 · Unit 3 Medicine · one video, two halves, one question

Core question: How can we access reliable health information with less effort — in the age of telemedicine and AI?

Listen for pros and cons · Think with clear numbers · Speak with evidence from the video

1

A visit to the hospital

You are the patient · three stops · look, tap, and say
Who are you today?
Walk through three stops. At each stop: look, tap, and say one sentence.
After class — the full seven stops (explore on your own)
🚌 commuting
“The bus took …” · crowded / far
receptionreception
register · queue · forms
waiting areawaiting area
wait · the number screen · tired
consultation roomconsultation room
describe symptoms · show · reassured
💳 payment
“I paid …” · another queue · paperwork
💊 pharmacy
get the medicine · the heavy bag · relieved
🏠 back home
“Hours were gone.” · exhausted
2

What is telemedicine?

A short animation · the three ways · concept check
Watch: What is telemedicine? · 38 secondsno subtitles

Which three ways did you see? Watch once, then tap the ways you caught.

message phone call video call an ambulance ride
The three ways: message · phone call · video call. (An ambulance ride is not telemedicine — you and the doctor are not far apart… and it is not advice from a distance.)
Different doctors and apps use one, two, or all three — but the idea is the same: a doctor's advice, without the same room.

Concept check 1

In telemedicine, is there still a doctor?

Yes — there is still a doctor (just far away).
No — telemedicine means no doctor at all.
Yes, there is still a doctor. Telemedicine is a doctor's advice delivered by technology — not a machine replacing the doctor.

Concept check 2

Do the patient and the doctor need to be in the same place?

Yes — they must be in the same room.
No — that is the whole point: advice from far away.
No — that is the point. “We are no longer required to visit a surgery … advice can be provided over the phone or online.”
3

Predict the aspects

Skill — strong viewers predict a list · seed: commuting

The topic is telemedicine. Which aspects of “telemedicine vs. an in-person visit” might the video mention? We seeded one — commuting.

Your turn: add one or two aspects of your own (up to four if you want a challenge).

commuting (seed)
You will tick, cross, or question-mark these after the first viewing — “never mentioned” is an honest answer too.
4

First half of the video

0:00–0:59 · no subtitles · check predictions · T/F · main idea
Watch (0:00–0:59)no subtitles · listen for pros and cons

Check your predictions

Go back to ③. For each aspect, mark it: the video mentioned it · it did not · ? you are not sure.

Add one reason for one of your marks — say it to your partner: “I marked ___ because I did not hear it.”
No aspects yet — add them in ③.

True or false?

Read each sentence, choose T or F, then check and read the evidence.

Main idea — choose one

After one viewing: what is the first half of the video mainly about?

5

Online info & AI diagnosis

A fictional scenario · two votes · two predictions
FICTIONAL SCENARIO

Lin has a headache. She searches online and finds two different explanations. Then she asks an AI chatbot — and gets a third one.

All three sound confident. Before trusting any of them, what could she check?

Think on your own — then vote below. (Later: bring your search results to the doctor as questions to check, not as answers.)

Vote A — health information online

Is medical information on websites generally reliable?

Tap your choice — you can change it.

Vote B — a diagnosis from an AI

Lin asks an AI chatbot to diagnose her headache. Is that generally reliable?

Tap your choice — you can change it.

Our class data (for the Saudi comparison)

Two conditional questions — count them one by one.

Two predictions — write before the second half

P1. Will the Saudi study figures be the same as our class, higher, or lower?
P2. What is the speaker's conclusion — and why does he believe it?

6

Second half of the video

0:59–2:29 · no subtitles · check both predictions
Watch (0:59–2:29)no subtitles · listen for figures and the speaker's point

The Saudi study — fill the figures

In one study in Saudi Arabia, people said they use the internet to check symptoms — but how many believed it was reliable?

92% said they use the internet to check symptoms. 65% believed online health information is reliable. 35% said they did not trust what they read.
Trust does not tell us whether the information was accurate.

Our class vs. the Saudi study

True or false? (from this half)

The speaker's conclusion — in your own words

You wrote a prediction in ⑤. Now that you've watched: what does the speaker conclude, and what reason did you hear? Write it yourself first — then check the reference.

“The best medical advice ultimately comes directly from a qualified medical professional.”
He believes it because checking symptoms online can misdiagnose, make you dismiss an illness wrongly, and turn you into a cyberchondriac — so anxious about imagined symptoms that you become physically ill.
Say it back — replay the final line and read it aloud with the speaker.
7

Group discussion

Three kinds of resources · the core question · speak with evidence

Sort the resources — three different things

These are not the same kind of thing. Tap a card, then tap the column it belongs to.

Doctor-led telemedicine
a real doctor, advice from a distance
Online health information
webpages you read yourself
AI-generated information
transfer discussion — the video does not discuss AI
Sorted: 0 / 6

Four-square notes — benefits & limitations

For each source, write one benefit (good point) and one limitation (bad point). Then label each idea: “in the video” or “my inference” (my own reasonable guess).

Telemedicine — benefits
Telemedicine — limitations
Web content — benefits
Web content — risks
Tap a chip, tap a square. In each square, say if it is “in the video” or “my inference”.
How can we access reliable health information with less effort — in the age of telemedicine and AI?

Everyone speaks: 30 seconds to prepare alone → A speaks 45 seconds, B notes the evidence → swap roles → both revise → two students share with the class.

Use the evidence frames. You may say “I think … because the video says …” — the reason is the point.

The video says that … According to the video, … In the Saudi study, …

My route — my own order

Which resource first, which next, and when to move on? Any order is fine — if you can give a reason. (Going straight to a doctor is also allowed.)

Self / peer rubric

Score yourself or your partner on each line — 1 (just starting) to 4 (secure).

8

Your route — and homework

Exit ticket · an information-check card

Exit ticket

One sentence, English: how will you combine these resources to stay reliable without wasting effort?

Homework — an information-check card

Imagine Lin's cousin (fictional): a headache for two days, and two different explanations online. Make him a small information-check card with four lines:

1 · the source I would check — 2 · one benefit of that source — 3 · one limitation or risk — 4 · one question to verify it —
Use ideas from the video where you can — and label them “in the video” or “my inference”.
课堂组织 · 时间账 · 答案与证据 · NEASC 映射 · 素材台账(教师用,叠起)

🖥 放映与翻页(课堂操作)

整份课件是「一次一环节」的翻页形态:底部分页器点圆点直达、左右箭头翻页;键盘 ← → 与 PageUp / PageDown(翻页笔默认发这四个键)翻页,Home / End 直达首末环节。翻到哪一页,刷新后仍停在那页;地址栏 ?p=4 就是第④环节,可直接发给学生。离页即停:翻走时该页正在播的视频会自动暂停。封面页保留大标题,其余页收起头图把版面让给内容;教师折叠条只在第⑧页出现。

⏱ 40 分钟时间账(v2 · 含听写压缩版)

分钟环节学生动作
0–3:00听写①(滚动:上单元核心词句)嵌入式常规
3:00–6:00① 医院场景核心路径(3′ 到点收束)选角色→3 空间 5W→词网→pair share
6:00–9:00② 新介绍片(38″ 单遍)+ 三方式核对 + 1 道概念判定看片→点选→判定
9:00–11:00③ 预测(A2 写 1–2 项)自拟 aspect
11:00–18:30④ 前半段 + gist 主旨 + T/F①②(错题可回放)看 seg1→作答→核对
18:30–23:30⑤ 虚构情境 + 两问投票 + 条件题 + 两预测个人投票+班级计数
23:30–31:30⑥ 后半段 + T/F③④ + 数字 + 结论先写后揭看 seg2→作答→自揭→修订
31:30–38:00⑦ 三列分拣 + 四格汇总 + 讨论(A45″/B记→互换)人人开口
38:00–40:00⑧ 退出条 + 信息核查卡作业exit ticket

Tasks x/8 口径:①场景问答卡 ≥2 ②自拟 aspect ≥1 ③T/F①② ④四格笔记 ≥1 ⑤个人投票(A/B 任一)⑥班级条件题 ≥1 ⑦路线任一框 ⑧退出条。七站完整探索与词网编辑模式为课后。

🔢 班级计数(自环节⑤移入 · 大屏共享时教师点)

Q1 分母=实到人数;Q2 分母=Q1 中「搜过」的人数(与视频 "65% of them" 同口径)。0 人时学生视图显示 no data yet。

✅ 答案与证据(对应屏幕四处揭示)

题答案证据(原片旁白)
T/F 1T“no longer required to visit a surgery … advice over the phone or online”
T/F 2F“Online consultations take place in the comfort of your home or workplace.”
T/F 3F“only 65% of them actually believed online health information to be reliable.”(第 2 半段)
T/F 4T“The term 'cyberchondriac' describes someone who compulsively searches the internet for medical information.”(第 2 半段)
Saudi92 / 65 / 35“92% … use the internet to check symptoms … only 65% … believed … reliable … 35% … didn't trust.”
Speaker 结论“best medical advice … from a qualified medical professional”理由:misdiagnosis / dismiss / cyberchondria 焦虑

🛟 分层支架(启航2班 · 人人可开)

右下角 🟠 支架抽屉三杠杆:Frame(句型开头)/Word bank(4 术语+释义)/Example(示范另一题)。界面不出现层级标签。递减建议:环节④⑤三枚全开 → 环节⑥仅词汇 → 环节⑦全撤。逐姓名建议只在此处,学生侧不可见。左下角「📤 My case file」= 导出学生档案,两种格式:Copy text(复制文本)与 Download JSON(下载结构化 JSON,含量表/四格笔记/退出条全量)。

🧭 NEASC ACE 映射(Doc 221 · 编号 Impact)

原则本课证据Impact
LP1 Learning Purposes真实议题 + 核心问 + AI 使用边界(虚构情境卡)1.1 / 1.2 / 1.4
LP3 Evidence of Learning预测→验证;咱班数据 vs Saudi;rubric 自评3.1 / 3.3 / 3.4
LP4 Learning Perspectives预测被推翻/不确定时诚实修正(4.1 从错误得洞见);随视频新信息调整四格笔记与判断(4.2)4.1 / 4.2
LP5 Engagement & Autonomy自选 aspects;自建 route;支架自取5.1 / 5.3
LP7 Inclusion, Equity, Belonging同题三档入口;每环人人有最低产出7.1 / 7.6
LP2 Dimensions(辅)画面+旁白→判断→整合路线的推理链2.1
LP9 Space & Time(辅)可反复回看片段、自定笔记节奏(9.2 时间自主)9.2
不承担 LP6 / LP8 / LP10社区研发、治理、长期福祉——单课不可取证—

📦 素材台账与风险提示

✅ 介绍片已替换为自制片 what_tel_v2.mp4(37.9″,3.4MB):覆盖 what is telemedicine(定义)+ 三方式 message / phone call / video call(教材 3E 口径),TTS 旁白(Samantha,158 wpm),Ken Burns 动效。逐字稿与时间点见 media/what_tel_v2_逐字稿.txt;制作管线可复现(media/what_tel_v2_制作脚本.py)。旧澳洲广告片已删除。

seg1(0–0:59)/ seg2(0:59–2:29,实测 90.5″,片尾无静音)由 3.mp4 切分、720p 重压;whisper 时间戳逐字稿为唯一内容源,Saudi=92/65/35 与四术语(consultation / misdiagnosis / dismiss / cyberchondriac)均已核对。T/F 四句已按 3E 学生书 p60 Ex 3 原句替换。

Support — use what you need

Classroom tools

quick start / pause
10:00
👉